Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas buys Alliance

Old 5th May 2022, 03:19
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: melbourne
Posts: 787
Received 66 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by davidclarke
Just what we need. Less competition.

This cannot be good for Australian aviation.

Let’s hope the accc stop this.

Yet another pilot group to play off against each other, further driving down wages…….
Isnt this exactly what he would have wanted,another group of pilots to play off against any other group that opposes him.
The word 'opportunist' comes to mind,along with a few others which would probably not be appropriate on here.
blubak is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 03:37
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 796
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
If it goes through, it’ll be the end of Fokker’s at Network.

They’ll focus on 320/321.

As for NJS, if they thought they had little cards to play in their EBA negotiations before, they have close to none now.
Going Nowhere is online now  
Old 5th May 2022, 04:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N/A
Posts: 165
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I have considerable respect for the timing and prescience demonstrated by Alliance's management. I'm guessing they think something is about to happen either in the economy or the aviation industry such that Alliance has chosen this moment as the best time to take the money and run. Remember their previous incarnation, Flight West Airlines, with some of the same names in management? Flight West chose to go into voluntary liquidation shortly before the Ansett collapse and was reincarnated/did a Phoenix as Alliance the following year. I wonder how it will play out this time around?
parishiltons is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 06:40
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 280
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
The initial rumour mill at Alliance was it could be up to 30 E190’s.

“We’ve opened up several new passenger routes using up to 18 of Alliance’s E190s, so bringing all 33 of these aircraft, plus their crews, into the Qantas Group would really expand what we could achieve.
“We plan to extend our program of guaranteed lower fares for residents in those few communities where Alliance operates its own passenger services, as well as access to our Frequent Flyer program,” added Mr Joyce
.

Maybe it wasn’t far off the mark . . . . . .
Australia2 is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 07:48
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,874
Likes: 0
Received 244 Likes on 105 Posts
No rumours needed. Just read the ASX releases. 16 announced and 14 announced. Thirty airframes.
If you want rumours, how about up to fifty aircraft.
I
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 10:33
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
VIrgin won’t be overly excited about if considering they also use Alliance in some RPT routes
Alice Kiwican is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 13:38
  #27 (permalink)  
IAW
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Over there
Posts: 187
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Alice Kiwican
VIrgin won’t be overly excited about if considering they also use Alliance in some RPT routes
Maybe VARAs announced 737-700s will be the replacement for East Coast F100 ops, not just west Coast FIFO?

IAW is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 14:12
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 340
Received 53 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
Depends how convincing Virgin’s argument is. They put forward a strong case against the QF/Japan tie up which got rejected (and rightly so), with the regulator citing many reasons VA raised.
Well, it'd have to be pretty convincing to get around the fact that VA bought SkyWest, then if I remember correctly, parked some of it's aircraft and some of the VA aircraft, then realised they didn't have enough so had to pay through the nose for Alliance to operate for them.

Couple that with the absolute debacle that was the A320/737 at TT and the stuff up with being kicked off the DPS route after repeatedly being warned it wasn't allowable to substitute another carrier, whether you owned them or not.

I think it would be hard to justify any objection after VA themselves gobbled up a FIFO carrier.

I look forward to QF showing VA how to make an E190 operate profitably.
AerialPerspective is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 15:09
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Earth
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 13 Posts
so the qantas domestic fleet now has

e190 94 seat's
f100 100 seat's
717 110 seat's
220 137 seat's
737 174 seat's
320 180 seat's
321 200 seat's

anymore niche's to fill?

unobtanium is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 15:15
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: In the soup
Posts: 214
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Welcome to the whipsaw, a common tactic US legacy airlines used for over 20 years to keep their regional partners cheap. It was literally this tactic that had regional pilots living on government assistance because they were paid so little.

The good news is, the whipsaw works both ways. If one of Qantas' subsidiaries can land a better contract, the others will rise too. But if one takes a concessionary contract, the rest come down. Good luck to all involved, you deserve a win.
DropYourSocks is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 20:17
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 565
Received 309 Likes on 107 Posts
Originally Posted by unobtanium
so the qantas domestic fleet now has

e190 94 seat's
f100 100 seat's
717 110 seat's
220 137 seat's
737 174 seat's
320 180 seat's
321 200 seat's

anymore niche's to fill?
I’ve heard they’ve put in a bid for Shoal Air (KNX) and Air Frontier (DRW) so they can further expand their network and ensure QF have adequate interline pax into the future.
aussieflyboy is online now  
Old 5th May 2022, 21:25
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,070
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
Welcome to the whipsaw, a common tactic US legacy airlines used for over 20 years to keep their regional partners cheap. It was literally this tactic that had regional pilots living on government assistance because they were paid so little.
A strategy which resulted in the bankruptcy of most regional airlines, new laws passed for minimum experience levels for RPT and a subsequent pilot shortage, with airlines forced to import foreign labour and put passengers on buses. But don’t worry I’m sure those in management who arranged all that still got their bonus.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 21:54
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Micks Place
Posts: 49
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by aussieflyboy
I’ve heard they’ve put in a bid for Shoal Air (KNX) and Air Frontier (DRW) so they can further expand their network and ensure QF have adequate interline pax into the future.
Can't wait for the photo op with Geoff and Alan, together, dressed in their business best in the Air Frontier 'boardroom' ​​​​​
belongamick is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 23:08
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kichin
Posts: 1,043
Received 677 Likes on 188 Posts
Originally Posted by neville_nobody
A strategy which resulted in the bankruptcy of most regional airlines, new laws passed for minimum experience levels for RPT and a subsequent pilot shortage, with airlines forced to import foreign labour and put passengers on buses. But don’t worry I’m sure those in management who arranged all that still got their bonus.
And let us not forget the Colgan accident. The tactic so loved by our airline management here in Oz actually contributed to the deaths of a Q400 load of people.
gordonfvckingramsay is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 23:52
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: In the soup
Posts: 214
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by neville_nobody
A strategy which resulted in the bankruptcy of most regional airlines, new laws passed for minimum experience levels for RPT and a subsequent pilot shortage, with airlines forced to import foreign labour and put passengers on buses. But don’t worry I’m sure those in management who arranged all that still got their bonus.
100%!! The whipsaw is an evil practice, but those who are implementing it today in Aus will have ridden off into the sunset years ahead of these consequences. Unfortunately, as is always the case, it's the pilots with broken careers left to pick up the pieces. Hopefully the US hoovers up enough Aussie pilots for the whipsaw to be to the detriment of airline management.

For perspective, the US is slated to hire in the order of 10,000 pilots every year for the next little while (how long who knows). Aussies won't make the slightest dent in the shortage here, but a loss of even 10% of the Aussie workforce would certainly liven up the domestic scene.
DropYourSocks is offline  
Old 6th May 2022, 01:57
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by neville_nobody
A strategy which resulted in the bankruptcy of most regional airlines, new laws passed for minimum experience levels for RPT and a subsequent pilot shortage, with airlines forced to import foreign labour and put passengers on buses. But don’t worry I’m sure those in management who arranged all that still got their bonus.
Slight difference is that in the USA, most “regionals” weren’t wholly owned - they were essentially wet leases. Most of the majors sold them off. A couple were bought back over the years but the leverage came from them being owned by independent companies fighting it out to get the flying contracts. This forced wages down.

Wasn’t it Pinnacle, when they were independently owned, that won a bid for delta flying (?) right after the pilots got a new contract and then filed for chapter 11 so they could revert to the old contract wages so they could continue the flying? Disgusting
stillcallozhome is offline  
Old 6th May 2022, 02:29
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It is inconceivable (to me) how a competition regulator could possibly approve this acquisition.
Alliance not only provides aircraft and crews to Qantas's main competitor, it also provides competition to Qantas and Virgin on FIFO and other charter contracts, such as transporting football teams around.
Qantas, at one swoop, would have driven up costs for Virgin, mining companies and anyone else that wants to hire an aircraft bigger than a Navajo.
Did the Morrison Government really provide all that taxpayer money to Qantas during the pandemic so that Mr. Joyce could spend it all on getting rid of his competition?
Never mind the ACCC there should be an outcry from the taxpayers!


Last edited by Mr Approach; 6th May 2022 at 02:30. Reason: spelling
Mr Approach is offline  
Old 6th May 2022, 03:05
  #38 (permalink)  
ebt
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 232
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Approach
It is inconceivable (to me) how a competition regulator could possibly approve this acquisition.
Alliance not only provides aircraft and crews to Qantas's main competitor, it also provides competition to Qantas and Virgin on FIFO and other charter contracts, such as transporting football teams around.
Qantas, at one swoop, would have driven up costs for Virgin, mining companies and anyone else that wants to hire an aircraft bigger than a Navajo.
Did the Morrison Government really provide all that taxpayer money to Qantas during the pandemic so that Mr. Joyce could spend it all on getting rid of his competition?
Never mind the ACCC there should be an outcry from the taxpayers!
The thing is that the ACCC looked into Qantas's first strike in taking the 20% slice of Alliance for three years, and ultimately cleared it, knowing full well that Qantas bought that stake with a view to taking over Alliance. The end of that investigation gave Qantas tacit approval, and although the ACCC will drag their feet in approving the full takeover, it will more than likely pass.

In a year or so once the takeover is completed, the landscape will look very interesting, but there are alternatives to QQ out there. Cobham has been scaling up the Q400s and E-Jets in WA and is up for sale, Airnorth has added frames and must surely be looking for some sweet, sweet charter revenue. Australian Corporate Jet now has an ERJ-145 and could add more pretty cheaply, so that could take up some of the more ad hoc work.
ebt is offline  
Old 6th May 2022, 04:20
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: NSW
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not bad for an airline that received a billion odd dollars in Gov support during covid and here we are 4 months after borders open able to spend a billion on another airline acquisition. Just proves what folks have said on here for years what a master manipulator AJ and his team really are. More like an Irish Shiester !
Jet Jockey is offline  
Old 6th May 2022, 04:47
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N/A
Posts: 165
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Approach
It is inconceivable (to me) how a competition regulator could possibly approve this acquisition.
Alliance not only provides aircraft and crews to Qantas's main competitor, it also provides competition to Qantas and Virgin on FIFO and other charter contracts, such as transporting football teams around.
Qantas, at one swoop, would have driven up costs for Virgin, mining companies and anyone else that wants to hire an aircraft bigger than a Navajo.
Did the Morrison Government really provide all that taxpayer money to Qantas during the pandemic so that Mr. Joyce could spend it all on getting rid of his competition?
Never mind the ACCC there should be an outcry from the taxpayers!
Joyce is not spending real money. The transaction is funded by issuing new Qantas shares and exchanging them for Alliance shares.
parishiltons is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.