Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

Removal of FI Night Instruction Restriction

Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Removal of FI Night Instruction Restriction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Dec 2019, 20:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 55N
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Removal of FI Night Instruction Restriction

Is there a requirement to undertake a 'formal' course wihin an ATO to remove the above restriction. FCL 905 FI requirement seems to suggest that it is only necessary to demonstrate competence to FIC/E. Form SRG 1133 would suggest some course of training required.
Any views or recent past experiences?
justmaybe is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 20:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a couple of hours of ground training covering the night rating syllabus and an hours flying.
chrisbl is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2019, 18:57
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 55N
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chrisbl
a couple of hours of ground training covering the night rating syllabus and an hours flying.
Tks chrisbl. Still just trying to determine whether this has to be done at or through ATO, or whether an independent FIC can sign it off.
justmaybe is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2019, 19:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Must be conducted at an ATO.
Whopity is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2019, 19:17
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 55N
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tks Whopity. That will do me. As usual, trying to decipher some (or most) of part fcl invariably leads to more than one possible interpretation. At this stage of the game it really shouldn't be like that. ( or maybe it's just me!!)
justmaybe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.