Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

VH-ODI final report

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th May 2020, 06:25
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Next door to the neighbor from hell, who believes in chemtrails!
Age: 75
Posts: 1,807
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
VH-ODI final report

https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications...r/ao-2018-080/

What happened

On 8 December 2018, a Desert-Air Safaris Beech Aircraft Corporation B200, registered VH-ODI operated a charter flight from Adelaide Airport to Mount Gambier Airport, South Australia with a pilot and seven passengers on board. One of the passengers held a commercial pilot licence and acted in an observer role from the right flight deck seat, but was not a member of the flight crew.

During the landing at Mount Gambier, the aircraft touched down with the landing gear retracted, with the propellers contacting the runway twice before the pilot initiated a go‑around. During the go-around, the left engine failed. The aircraft then landed without further incident.

What the ATSB found

The ATSB found that upon reaching the minimum descent altitude for an approach to Runway 18 at Mount Gambier, the pilot had not yet obtained visual reference with the runway. He therefore commenced a go-around and retracted the landing gear. After retracting the landing gear, the pilot sighted the runway and decided to continue the approach, but inadvertently did not re-extend the landing gear.

During the continued approach, the pilot likely did not detect the retracted landing gear due to an expectation that it was already extended. This was possibly also compounded by the now‑increased workload.

Further, the ATSB found that the pilot’s decision to conduct a go-around after the wheels-up landing stemmed from his misunderstanding of the situation, and an assessment that a runway overrun was imminent.

Safety message

This accident highlights the hazards of spontaneous decision-making, particularly during a high‑workload phase of flight in a complex aircraft. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority Resource booklet and video Decision Making provides the following tips to improve the quality of decision making, mitigate the possibility of errors and ensure a considered approach in resolving issues or problems:
  • You cannot improvise a good decision, you must prepare for it. You will make a better and timelier final decision if you have considered all options in advance. This is why good briefings are important.
  • Use decision-making aids—operational checklists—to ensure you have not forgotten anything important.
  • Always have reserve capacity for reacting to unexpected events.
  • Delegate your load to other team members (if multi-crew) when time is critical.
  • Keep the big picture in mind rather than focusing on one aspect of a problem.
Desert Flower is offline  
Old 20th May 2020, 10:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wondered what happened to that final report! Seems almost scene fiction to get away wth that!
ive got a couple of hrs on the 200, they are bulletproof, well almost!
machtuk is offline  
Old 20th May 2020, 12:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Around
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Two points come to mind from this report:

- Once the decision has been made to go around/missed approach it shouldn’t be changed. Saving an approach from the MDA/MAP (or after) and still making a stable approach is rarely possible. Cut your losses and go back for another careful try.

- After a missed approach, with each subsequent approach pilots tend to take more risks, rush, cut corners and make more mistakes. Each time you make another approach you the more likely you are to make a mistake. This tendency should be front of mind when conducting a missed approach and intending to try again.

These things can happen to us all, regardless of experience.
Hamley is offline  
Old 20th May 2020, 12:46
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hamley
Two points come to mind from this report:

- Once the decision has been made to go around/missed approach it shouldn’t be changed. Saving an approach from the MDA/MAP (or after) and still making a stable approach is rarely possible. Cut your losses and go back for another careful try.

- After a missed approach, with each subsequent approach pilots tend to take more risks, rush, cut corners and make more mistakes. Each time you make another approach you the more likely you are to make a mistake. This tendency should be front of mind when conducting a missed approach and intending to try again.

These things can happen to us all, regardless of experience.
thats all pretty obvious to a responsible pilot BUT there will always be one single Unknown, one variable.....the human element!
machtuk is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.