Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

Qatar Airways Cargo 777 damages its right wing

Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Qatar Airways Cargo 777 damages its right wing

Old 7th Aug 2022, 09:49
  #1 (permalink)  
ddd
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Paradise
Age: 61
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qatar Airways Cargo 777 damages its right wing

=AZWwfpHPvayJdn36O4jvBe1a9OBovBCk77WUOf04cCJ8dkKoL1Rg1GBAbtO 31KUmDv_UOnXZ7TW6XYd3QSaNdUeolc4fhPzsdr25VMU_TWjpIwGLYqt_fRU aA6y7NdvIm8MnkizWLkC_NVLWDZjXjhYlwNssmWFGUCYkQzWwg0HbBYq7MhL T9HKopvwgseOqmrxju-2WIU5VkV0qOFTZBzPn&__tn__=*NK-y-R]Qatar Airways Cargo 777 damages it's right wing after hitting a lamp post while taxiing at Chicago O'Hare Airport. No injuries reported.


ddd is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2022, 09:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Dodo Island
Posts: 103
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oops forgot to fold the wingtips.

More seriously wasn't anywhere close. Wonder how they got it that wrong 🤔
zambonidriver is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2022, 11:20
  #3 (permalink)  
Rie
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Wan Chai
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are on BB2. Must have missed the turn down to U and thought they could skip straight onto Z. They have ended up in the Regional Jet parking apron with a taxiway wingspan max of 36m. Tad shy of the 65m needed to get down there.
Rie is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2022, 14:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Europe
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rie
They are on BB2. Must have missed the turn down to U and thought they could skip straight onto Z. They have ended up in the Regional Jet parking apron with a taxiway wingspan max of 36m. Tad shy of the 65m needed to get down there.
Well they just followed ATC instruction perfectly
wing-man is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2022, 17:15
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Europe/Middle East
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3 more vacancies coming up
VelocityNeverExceed is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2022, 18:45
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Dodo Island
Posts: 103
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wing-man
Well they just followed ATC instruction perfectly
Interesting - so they were routed to an innapropriate taxiway ?
zambonidriver is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2022, 18:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: DXB
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh oh,... I took a second look and now I see that the lamp post will need to be replaced!
Fog Ducker is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2022, 20:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colchester, Essex. UK
Posts: 62
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qatar cargo ooops at Chicago

Full details and link to photo
https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/281206
drichard is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2022, 21:02
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Far East
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
No matter what ATC cleared the crew fo do, the crew could not judge that? Thats is not clipping the wing tip!
CDRW is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2022, 07:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 35
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If only obstacles like that could be fitted with some sort of illuminated beacon...🙂
Grummaniser is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2022, 18:17
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
according to an article from 'liveandletsfly' all four pilots on board the aircraft have been fired.
SkyHawk6E is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2022, 09:28
  #12 (permalink)  
Rie
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Wan Chai
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SkyHawk6E
according to an article from 'liveandletsfly' all four pilots on board the aircraft have been fired.
The is the expat risk. With 2 sets of crew onboard all in the cockpit then all are liable for anything that goes wrong. In this case a taxiing down a Max 36 wingspan taxiway should have been picked up by someone... Clearly it wasn't.
Rie is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2022, 10:08
  #13 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,877
Received 154 Likes on 48 Posts
Note to those scrambling to join Qatar…in the Middle East you are only as good as your last sector. ( Even if on that sector you are in the back seats.)
SOPS is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2022, 15:27
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking at Google Earth, the taxiway doesn't seem to have any paintwork listing the wingspan limits - These seem to appear (very usefully!) in some places (for an example you could check EHAM ramp here). Simple, cheap, effective...
Cough is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2022, 12:06
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: .
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cough
Looking at Google Earth, the taxiway doesn't seem to have any paintwork listing the wingspan limits - These seem to appear (very usefully!) in some places (for an example you could check EHAM ramp here). Simple, cheap, effective...
Ball note #13 on the airport diagram chart. No other reference that I can find.
WrldWide is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2022, 09:18
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: EARTH
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
were only two in the cockpit. Atlanta Chicago is not a long flight. I don't know if was any dead heading crew. Even if was any why to fire them. It's not reasonable. I am not sure the article is correct
toseg is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2022, 10:02
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Dodo Island
Posts: 103
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even if was any why to fire them.
SOP I'm afraid
zambonidriver is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2022, 17:55
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: in the world
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by toseg
were only two in the cockpit. Atlanta Chicago is not a long flight. I don't know if was any dead heading crew. Even if was any why to fire them. It's not reasonable. I am not sure the article is correct
just 2 crew and no deadheading
bongo bongo is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2022, 00:26
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Clemente, CA
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QR Fires All 4 Pilots!


ORD is a jungle, even for this former United pilot!
l have a bad feeling these poor bastards flew all the way from Doha to Atlanta and then Chicago?
Talking about being so fatigued, you turn into a taxiway not authorized for your aircraft and perhaps with some help from a sleepy Ground Controller you find that damn light pole that jumps in front of you out of nowhere and wrap your wing around it!
l have no idea what happened nor l want blame anyone without knowing al the facts. But for QR to fire these guys on the spot, without any investigation is petty ****ty, l think.
l trained a couple of QR 777 crews when they first got them and a little familiar with their “off with their heads” culture. Those of you on Linkdin may want to have some fun finding my post about this, and the beatings l received from non pilots and obviously QR shills for suggesting fatigue may have been a part in this unfortunate incident.
lf you’ve never fallen asleep inside the Marker, hand flying a 707, don’t bother! 😎
787PIC is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2022, 05:15
  #20 (permalink)  
zzz
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: N/A
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

Originally Posted by CDRW
No matter what ATC cleared the crew fo do, the crew could not judge that? Thats is not clipping the wing tip!

You can’t see the wingtip from the flight deck of a 777
zzz is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.