Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

China's C919 maiden commercial flight

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

China's C919 maiden commercial flight

Old 28th May 2023, 11:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 264
Received 159 Likes on 78 Posts
China's C919 maiden commercial flight

China’s first domestically produced passenger jet makes maiden commercial flight

"China’s first domestically produced passenger jet took off on its maiden commercial flight on Sunday, a milestone event in the nation’s decades-long effort to compete with western rivals in the air.

Beijing hopes the C919 commercial jetliner will challenge foreign models like the Boeing 737 MAX and the Airbus A320, though many of its parts are sourced from abroad.

Its first homegrown jetliner with mass commercial potential would also cut the country’s reliance on foreign technology as ties with the West deteriorate..."

I can't say I'll be rushing to be one of the first passengers.
artee is online now  
Old 28th May 2023, 11:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,281
Received 162 Likes on 83 Posts
Originally Posted by artee

I can't say I'll be rushing to be one of the first passengers
Any particular reason why not?
Capt Fathom is online now  
Old 28th May 2023, 11:50
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 264
Received 159 Likes on 78 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
Any particular reason why not?
I'd like to see an established safety record first.
artee is online now  
Old 28th May 2023, 11:55
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,281
Received 162 Likes on 83 Posts
Originally Posted by artee
I'd like to see an established safety record first.
Define an established safety record.
Capt Fathom is online now  
Old 28th May 2023, 12:08
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 264
Received 159 Likes on 78 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
Define an established safety record.
I'm not being scientific about this, I'd just rather not fly on one until they have a track record. Unreasonable, possibly.
artee is online now  
Old 28th May 2023, 12:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,788
Received 196 Likes on 90 Posts
A tad over 6 years since the C919's maiden flight, and almost 6 months since the first delivery to the launch customer, would suggest that all hasn't gone terribly well in the meantime
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 28th May 2023, 12:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We are going to poke fun at the Chinese venture into aerospace (naturally) but one thing you need to know about Chinese culture is that they don't like failure, as to fail means to lose face. And so their attitude to engineering right now will be way more robust than Boeing's over the last decade.
Superpilot is offline  
Old 28th May 2023, 12:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,060
Received 64 Likes on 39 Posts
Quite a progress compared to the recent ARJ21 but I am not sure if they could do a CR929 widebody alone? Let's wait for their first export customers.
Less Hair is online now  
Old 28th May 2023, 13:28
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Between the flower pots
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would be a brave western airline to order this aircraft. With the Chinese government continuing to make threats against Taiwan orders might never be delivered.
Pain in the R's is offline  
Old 28th May 2023, 13:42
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,788
Received 196 Likes on 90 Posts
Originally Posted by Superpilot
We are going to poke fun at the Chinese venture into aerospace (naturally) but one thing you need to know about Chinese culture is that they don't like failure, as to fail means to lose face. And so their attitude to engineering right now will be way more robust than Boeing's over the last decade.
I'm not casting any aspersions on Chinese engineering But, at the end of the day, it's not good engineering that sells airliners, but many other factors.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 28th May 2023, 14:48
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can see it now" "Please hold for the next available airliner salesperson..."
averow is offline  
Old 28th May 2023, 16:31
  #12 (permalink)  
YRP
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
A tad over 6 years since the C919's maiden flight, and almost 6 months since the first delivery to the launch customer, would suggest that all hasn't gone terribly well in the meantime
I don't know if that is the correct interpretation. It might be but it might not. Lots of possibilities: 1. they took the time to get it right, 2. reduced investment / team size, 3. inexperienced team that was learning as they went, 4. difficulties, as you said. And probably a few others.

From my experience in engineering development (electronics / high tech), getting out on schedule / fast can be a good or bad thing, often means immature management: gotta get out fast, worry about problems later, optimistic rather than careful. Design verification can be done _properly_ or going through the motions. Eg the testing on the Max.

I respect a team that takes the time rather than rushes. (If that was the case).

Not meaning to be critical of your comment, just been in this type of situation a lot.
YRP is offline  
Old 28th May 2023, 16:43
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
A tad over 6 years since the C919's maiden flight, and almost 6 months since the first delivery to the launch customer, would suggest that all hasn't gone terribly well in the meantime
Doesn't seem terrible given similar timescales are likely for sticking a new wing and engines on the 777...
Ben_S is offline  
Old 28th May 2023, 16:55
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,254
Received 329 Likes on 194 Posts
or converting the 767 to a tanker...................
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 28th May 2023, 17:15
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,788
Received 196 Likes on 90 Posts


Even after allowing for the US bias, still a pretty realistic assessment of China's troubled commercial aircraft manufacturing industry, and COMAC in particular.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 28th May 2023, 18:50
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Washington.
Age: 73
Posts: 1,071
Received 151 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
Any particular reason why not?
The Chinese did everything they could to avoid full compliance with certification standards, pencil-whipping wherever possible.
The FAA gave up trying to help them. Their heart wasn’t in it, only their pocketbook.
GlobalNav is offline  
Old 28th May 2023, 21:44
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Age: 56
Posts: 945
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
Any particular reason why not?
I think I can see where you are coming from. I did a lot of home improvement, and every bit of the parts I used were miC. All certified safe and legal. But a casual search on YouTube for escalator/elevator deaths will show a lot of videos from china.
hans brinker is offline  
Old 28th May 2023, 21:44
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: not where I want to be
Posts: 516
Received 42 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
I'm not casting any aspersions on Chinese engineering But, at the end of the day, it's not good engineering that sells airliners, but many other factors.
Tex Johnston would have you believe it's tipping people upside down in a machine that sells them...

FP.
First_Principal is offline  
Old 28th May 2023, 22:11
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,362
Received 77 Likes on 34 Posts
Interesting situation that China finds itself in. A natural customer would be Russia after the war, but sanctions on engines and avionics are likely to be long-lasting. China itself cannot rattle sabres across the Taiwan strait for the same reasons.

While I personally eschew Chinese products where I have an option I don’t doubt their engineering prowess per se.
Australopithecus is offline  
Old 29th May 2023, 07:45
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,437
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And so their attitude to engineering right now will be way more robust than Boeing's over the last decade.
Which is a very, very low bar set.
His dudeness is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.