Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Illegal Salvage from Repulse and Prince of Wales Wrecks

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Illegal Salvage from Repulse and Prince of Wales Wrecks

Old 28th May 2023, 21:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 467 Likes on 191 Posts
Illegal Salvage from Repulse and Prince of Wales Wrecks

Reports of the illegal salvage from wrecks of the Repulse and Prince of Wales by a Chinese Salvage Barge have been made.


https://news.usni.org/2023/05/25/u-k...of-wwii-wrecks
SASless is offline  
Old 28th May 2023, 23:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,470
Received 2,594 Likes on 1,098 Posts
The trouble is SASless the UK MOD are a bunch of gasbags, make a noise. but let it happen, so it will not surprise me if they stand by and let them do it, Just as they have done in the past with the Dutch etc... personally I would seize the barge, scrap it and send the crew home.

See

http://thepipeline.info/blog/2016/05...-fails-to-act/

The irony in this is the Dutch did nothing then this happened

https://www.theguardian.com/science/...wrecks-of-java
NutLoose is offline  
Old 29th May 2023, 02:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,356
Received 157 Likes on 75 Posts
Is salvage of old wrecks actually criminal? Despicable - no question, but is it really illegal?
tdracer is online now  
Old 29th May 2023, 04:09
  #4 (permalink)  
fdr
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 3rd Rock, #29B
Posts: 2,944
Received 847 Likes on 251 Posts
Originally Posted by tdracer
Is salvage of old wrecks actually criminal? Despicable - no question, but is it really illegal?
Yes, they remain the property of the flag state, and removal of any part of them would be the same as stealing any part of a military ship or plane or vehicle above high tide mark. The old wrecks are separately covered by UNCLOS, and trafficking in their artefacts is trafficking, and all involved can be prosecuted. The War Grave case is a separate matter but causes offensive.

When project Azorian/Glomar Explorer raised part of K-129, that was not compliant with international law, and the embarrassment of the USSR was sufficient to keep it a relatively open secret. The handing over of the ships bell by the US to the Russian Federation in 1993 made a point but also followed the law. 18 years late, but better late than never. The fact that the bell was inside the bit of the sub that was supposedly never recovered was apparently not lost on the Russians.

Spoiler
 

fdr is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 29th May 2023, 06:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lost again...
Posts: 895
Received 120 Likes on 55 Posts
How about an embargo on buying scientific or medical equipment and machinery from China or that contains steel sourced from China?

Not going to happen though is it!!!
OvertHawk is offline  
Old 29th May 2023, 06:56
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,254
Received 329 Likes on 194 Posts
Originally Posted by tdracer
Is salvage of old wrecks actually criminal? Despicable - no question, but is it really illegal?
It's clearly illegal in UK law and it's certainly disrespectful

But , TBH, it doesn't do anyone a lot of harm

I'd like to see what President Xi would say if we decided to tear up some of their history (well, of course we did years back)
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 29th May 2023, 14:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lost again...
Posts: 895
Received 120 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
It's clearly illegal in UK law and it's certainly disrespectful

But , TBH, it doesn't do anyone a lot of harm

I'd like to see what President Xi would say if we decided to tear up some of their history (well, of course we did years back)
It's illegal under international law! But since when has China taken any notice of that.
OvertHawk is offline  
Old 29th May 2023, 16:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,624
Received 65 Likes on 40 Posts
Perhaps it`s time for the PM to invite the Chinese Ambassador/Consul ,in for a `chop suey `takeaway,with added sour sauce...
sycamore is online now  
Old 29th May 2023, 16:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,254
Received 329 Likes on 194 Posts
"It's illegal under internationallaw! But since when has China taken any notice of that."

The problem with international law is who is going to enforce it I'm afraid.
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 29th May 2023, 16:58
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 756
Received 507 Likes on 183 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
"It's illegal under internationallaw! But since when has China taken any notice of that."
The problem with international law is who is going to enforce it I'm afraid.
Never mind the law, you'd have thought common decency might prevent grave robbing. A concept clearly absent from China.


​​​​​
Video Mixdown is online now  
Old 29th May 2023, 17:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,254
Received 329 Likes on 194 Posts
I don't think many large Western Corporations have much of a sense of decency either - after all one blew up a Native Australian religious site not long ago.............
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 29th May 2023, 17:45
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
“…prompting a statement of concern from the Royal Navy…”

That should be sufficient. Problem solved.
BFSGrad is online now  
Old 29th May 2023, 18:17
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 467 Likes on 191 Posts
It might. be noted that some WWII wrecks of ships sunk either by U-Boats or other causes have been reduced in height by explosives and cable drags when thought to be a hazard to navigation.

No thought was given to salvage or scavenge of the wrecks prior to that being done.....not withstanding there might have been Remains of those Lost still inside the wrecks.

If we do that kind of thing as a normal practice can we make too big an issue of what the Chinese are doing.

Either way.....some Remains will have surely been disturbed or destroyed.
SASless is offline  
Old 29th May 2023, 20:52
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: SW England
Age: 72
Posts: 251
Received 78 Likes on 42 Posts
Did anyone make a fuss when we recovered a sunk U boat off the north of Ireland to salvage it's non-nuclear steel for use in medical scanners decades ago?

Non-nuclear steel (steel smelted before Hiroshima) attracts a hefty price premium. It's a dwindling resource that cannot be replenished. Everyone is salvaging it where they can.
_Agrajag_ is offline  
Old 29th May 2023, 22:14
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 353
Received 145 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by _Agrajag_
Did anyone make a fuss when we recovered a sunk U boat off the north of Ireland to salvage it's non-nuclear steel for use in medical scanners decades ago?

Non-nuclear steel (steel smelted before Hiroshima) attracts a hefty price premium. It's a dwindling resource that cannot be replenished. Everyone is salvaging it where they can.
You may be referring to one of the German submarines ("U-Boats") deliberately scuttled at sea by the Royal Navy post-war.

The day before the conclusion of hostilities in Europe, all sea-going submarines of the Kriegsmarine received instructions from Karl Doenitz (nice moniker, by the way) to surface and surrender themselves at one or two allied ports. Apart from a few of the later designs which were distributed between the victor-nations for research and development purposes, the remainder were assembled in Loch Foyle and, in a massive operation lasting around 3 months under the auspices of Operation Deadlight, all were towed to a location around 150km north of Ireland and scuttled.

All were unmanned and, so far as I am aware, there were no casualties.
DuncanDoenitz is online now  
The following 2 users liked this post by DuncanDoenitz:
Old 30th May 2023, 00:41
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,914
Received 125 Likes on 74 Posts
According to one news site, the Malaysians have impounded the boat and arrested the crew.

They were allegedly lifting unexploded ordnance and parts of ship structure.

Some time ago I read about how steel from pre-atomic bomb days is highly valuable for making sensitive measuring instruments, as it is free from trace modern radiation.
jolihokistix is offline  
Old 30th May 2023, 07:05
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,254
Received 329 Likes on 194 Posts
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-65750908Malaysia has detained a Chinese-registered vessel suspected of looting two British World War Two shipwrecks.

The bulk carrier was seized on Sunday for anchoring illegally at the site in the South China Sea. Ammunition believed to be from the HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse, which were sunk by Japanese forces more than 80 years ago, was then found on board. The UK Ministry of Defence had earlier condemned the alleged raid as a "desecration" of maritime war graves.

Fishermen and divers first reported the presence of the foreign vessel to Malaysia authorities last month. Local maritime police detained the Chinese ship on Sunday. The ship, registered in Fuzhou, had 32 crew on board, the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA) said in a statement. Cannon shells "suspected to be from World War Two" were uncovered during a search of the vessel. Malaysian agencies are also investigating the provenance of the ammunition. The MMEA added that it is linked to a cache of unexploded artillery, said to be from the two sunken vessels, that police seized from a private scrap yard in the southern state of Johor earlier this month.

In 2017, during a tour of Malaysia, a local diver showed the then Prince Charles images that documented damage to the HMS Prince of Wales inflicted by scavengers. The Defence Secretary at the time responded by saying the UK would work with Malaysian and Indonesian governments to investigate claims that up to six British warships had been plundered in their waters.
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 30th May 2023, 07:12
  #18 (permalink)  
fdr
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 3rd Rock, #29B
Posts: 2,944
Received 847 Likes on 251 Posts
The munitions on a civil flagged vessel could end up with hefty jail time attest for the skipper and some of the crew. You can get the death penalty for having ammo in some countries around there, that would put a damper on the festivities.
fdr is offline  
Old 30th May 2023, 07:25
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 264
Received 159 Likes on 78 Posts
Originally Posted by fdr
The munitions on a civil flagged vessel could end up with hefty jail time attest for the skipper and some of the crew. You can get the death penalty for having ammo in some countries around there, that would put a damper on the festivities.
And I suspect the ammo itself could be quite unstable. It's why they are being very circumspect about clearing the SS Richard Montgomery in the Thames.
artee is online now  
Old 30th May 2023, 09:00
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,254
Received 329 Likes on 194 Posts
Originally Posted by fdr
The munitions on a civil flagged vessel could end up with hefty jail time attest for the skipper and some of the crew. You can get the death penalty for having ammo in some countries around there, that would put a damper on the festivities.
especially in Malaysia - but let's be honest - the malaysians aren't going to pick that sort of fight with China. I'm fairly impressed they've arrested the ship tho'.
Asturias56 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.