Civil persecution of Servicemen & women
Thread Starter
Civil persecution of Servicemen & women
Great idea to improve recruitment! Just seen on the news that those who served in Iraq may be prosecuted. So if one obeys a duff order you might go to jail. If you disobey it, you may be Court Marshalled, then go to jail.
However, our enemies can do what they like and eventually be compensated.
ps sorry, the title was meant to say 'Prosecution', but perhaps I'll leave it as it is.
However, our enemies can do what they like and eventually be compensated.
ps sorry, the title was meant to say 'Prosecution', but perhaps I'll leave it as it is.
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Valid point, sharpend. Of course it's always been the case that servicemen and women are subject to the rule of law. The big difference now is that there is close-up high-definition video of most engagements. Every use of force is now potentially open to forensic examination by some right-on team of lawyers perhaps twenty or thirty years down the line.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If there were actual war crimes to investigate then this has always been the case that British personnel are held to account. What has annoyed me over this story are the sound bite news stories I'm hearing today. One spokesman just said that there is NO evidence at the moment but it's likely that evidence exists. So it seems we are trying to find evidence at public expense to then be able to get service personnel in court. Didn't we learn that approach is corrupt with the Shiner cases?
How far back will these cases go? Almost all operations in WW1 and WW2 involved war crimes by today's standards.
How far back will these cases go? Almost all operations in WW1 and WW2 involved war crimes by today's standards.
IHAT
This appears to be another one of those quangos that NEEDS to show that there is a problem in order to justify its contain existence and funding. A very dangerous scenario. BBC et al will of course be cheerleading when ever possible.
Standards do have to be met, but who not just prosecute cases which come to light in the normal way.
KB
Standards do have to be met, but who not just prosecute cases which come to light in the normal way.
KB
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
BS, I would imagine cases could go back as far as a law change. As far as compensation goes there seems practically no limit - Japanese comfort women, Mau Mau etc.
Best advice today would seem to be keep any relevant ROE cards, green/yellow or whatever. I know we used to be issued with revised cards and destroy the old one, but any action taken should apply to the card extant at the time.
Where orders are Secret at least keep a copy of the reference dtg etc.
Best advice today would seem to be keep any relevant ROE cards, green/yellow or whatever. I know we used to be issued with revised cards and destroy the old one, but any action taken should apply to the card extant at the time.
Where orders are Secret at least keep a copy of the reference dtg etc.
Just remember manufactured evidence at the Al-Sweady inquiry.
Are we going to trust the evidence presented by lawyers on behalf of an enemy?
In any case, the greatest war crime against your own people is losing.
Are we going to trust the evidence presented by lawyers on behalf of an enemy?
In any case, the greatest war crime against your own people is losing.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Is it worth the risk?
This whole sordid business makes me very angry.
We are fighting enemies who operate freely and without any RoE while our people are shackled by poli's and lawyers to the extent that one must consult a "reference" card before deciding on an action.
With an ever increasing chance that even if the reference card is incorrect or the action is purely self-preservation, or with the passage of time, an enquiry into the circumstances of your action becomes highly likely, when will service to the crown become a risk too great to bear?
When applicants sign on the dotted line are they made familiar with all of the potential pitfalls of the job? I suspect not.
When enough manpower can no longer be raised to fight, I look forward to the conscription of lawyers and poli's to the front line.
Imagegear.
We are fighting enemies who operate freely and without any RoE while our people are shackled by poli's and lawyers to the extent that one must consult a "reference" card before deciding on an action.
With an ever increasing chance that even if the reference card is incorrect or the action is purely self-preservation, or with the passage of time, an enquiry into the circumstances of your action becomes highly likely, when will service to the crown become a risk too great to bear?
When applicants sign on the dotted line are they made familiar with all of the potential pitfalls of the job? I suspect not.
When enough manpower can no longer be raised to fight, I look forward to the conscription of lawyers and poli's to the front line.
Imagegear.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe trying to enjoy retirement “YES”
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sordid being a less descriptive word than I would use, however I do agree with the comments above. With the wish now to view actions by our military just to bring about prosecutions and to justify a number of well paid and attended committees should be no surprise.
Get the military to fix problems that the politicians have created, then when the dust has settled sift through the operations reports and shaft a few veterans seems par for the course to me.
Seen the same thing after the Yemen junket, and some
other operations.
Glad I am not young and thinking of serving my country, as your country may not serve you very well after the event.
outhouse
Get the military to fix problems that the politicians have created, then when the dust has settled sift through the operations reports and shaft a few veterans seems par for the course to me.
Seen the same thing after the Yemen junket, and some
other operations.Glad I am not young and thinking of serving my country, as your country may not serve you very well after the event.
outhouse
Thread Starter
Already Sky News are stating that this will deter people from joining the Armed Forces, at a time when recruitment in places is very low. So if we have insufficient members, then who will drive the Green Goddesses (oops, forgot the Government sold them), fill sandbags for flooded areas, go to Africa to treat virus victims, protect the UK from terrorists (and the Government from protesters), take over from Police, Fire and medics when they strike, oh, and I nearly forgot... fight wars?
One can cancel Christmas for a soldier, but if there are none?
One can cancel Christmas for a soldier, but if there are none?
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The lesson is: Dont join up and serve.
Oh yes it is.At any one time there are many investigations going on against the Army (today in the papers I saw Northern Ireland 1971/2 (todays Belfast Telegraph page 1 online) and Iraq 2003+ (Guardian page 1 and Daily Telegraph page 1).
However a strange thing is happening=its always, always the lower social orders they are sticking it on at present - always the rough speaking fighters. No one above NCO rank ever seems to get clobbered (at the moment).
Its a big mistake for the future of recruitment, of course. I wouldn't recommend anyone to go within a million miles of a signing-up form in any service, (at any level actually), because of this new threat. Any intelligent kid will glance the papers, reason that one out and avoid the military as a bad career.
Also another reason why no-one should be allowed to join up anything below the age of 18. (And without having an independent advisor available to counter the MOD spin when anyone does go in to sign up might be another thing to bolt on).
And in a nutshell, I think a lot of power-people have a real disdain for the military and certainly don't mind putting the boot in.
And a final parting shot - this is just the start of it. They've picked on the dimmest people first (the poor bloody infantry) for a reason. Believe me it will go up the food chain eventually, because that's the way wars and the killing have gone, are going. In the future it will be the ROV controller, the drone operators, the Tornado crews button-pressers who will be dragged in to any number of spurious, obscure claims. Think not? Don't bet on it. Put it this way I don't see any number of politicians falling down the aisles to bring in any protective legislation to servicemen - show me where they are, someone?
This is modern Britain. Its entirely split, its totally divided and its utterly uncaring because that's the way we have made it.
However a strange thing is happening=its always, always the lower social orders they are sticking it on at present - always the rough speaking fighters. No one above NCO rank ever seems to get clobbered (at the moment).
Its a big mistake for the future of recruitment, of course. I wouldn't recommend anyone to go within a million miles of a signing-up form in any service, (at any level actually), because of this new threat. Any intelligent kid will glance the papers, reason that one out and avoid the military as a bad career.
Also another reason why no-one should be allowed to join up anything below the age of 18. (And without having an independent advisor available to counter the MOD spin when anyone does go in to sign up might be another thing to bolt on).
And in a nutshell, I think a lot of power-people have a real disdain for the military and certainly don't mind putting the boot in.
And a final parting shot - this is just the start of it. They've picked on the dimmest people first (the poor bloody infantry) for a reason. Believe me it will go up the food chain eventually, because that's the way wars and the killing have gone, are going. In the future it will be the ROV controller, the drone operators, the Tornado crews button-pressers who will be dragged in to any number of spurious, obscure claims. Think not? Don't bet on it. Put it this way I don't see any number of politicians falling down the aisles to bring in any protective legislation to servicemen - show me where they are, someone?
This is modern Britain. Its entirely split, its totally divided and its utterly uncaring because that's the way we have made it.
HS
You must have missed this:
Cleared Mendonca quits army | World news | The Guardian
I agree in the main though. We must be able to go to war with top cover so that, should we adhere to the LOAC and Geneva Principles etc, we should be free from frivolous claims.
No one above NCO rank ever seems to get clobbered (at the moment).
Cleared Mendonca quits army | World news | The Guardian
I agree in the main though. We must be able to go to war with top cover so that, should we adhere to the LOAC and Geneva Principles etc, we should be free from frivolous claims.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Basil
What you say is so obvious that it's worrying that you even need to say it.
There is something just so so wring that UK citizens struggle to get any form of legal aid while the UK tax payer will be paying for our enemies to go to court and say whether our forces are fair. The bizarre thing is that ISIS spend hundreds of thousands of dollars promoting themselves online or rubbishing the West, but now the UK government will be paying out UK cash to help the ISIS pay-ops campaign.
Makes you wonder why officers and NCOs write up their daily activities and monitor their subordinates !
What you say is so obvious that it's worrying that you even need to say it.
There is something just so so wring that UK citizens struggle to get any form of legal aid while the UK tax payer will be paying for our enemies to go to court and say whether our forces are fair. The bizarre thing is that ISIS spend hundreds of thousands of dollars promoting themselves online or rubbishing the West, but now the UK government will be paying out UK cash to help the ISIS pay-ops campaign.
Makes you wonder why officers and NCOs write up their daily activities and monitor their subordinates !
I reckon that the time I served gives me a right to a post on here. The fault doesn't lie with our military, this is a total, political stitch up. Particularly Iraq 2003, where the elephant in the room is the bloke who lied his way in there, and those that supported him (crikey, the current occupant of No10) ! I'm damn sure that British troops did no worse that US troops, but you won't see many Americans investigated like this. It seems that the current government is quite happy to see people who put their necks on the line, as ordered by them, being slaughtered on the altar of political correctness. Whee are the defence chiefs on all this ? Heads down, counting the mounting pension pots I suspect. Military covenant, grossly insulting praise for good men, whilst offering platitudes to those who support the terrorists. As others have already stated, I would think twice about joining if I was "of that age" nowadays.
On a different tack. Happy New year to fellow PPRUNERs. Keep those "Lums" reeking !!!
Smudge
On a different tack. Happy New year to fellow PPRUNERs. Keep those "Lums" reeking !!!
Smudge
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the past I have commented about the practices of the group of lawyers who call them selfs Public Interest Lawyers.
These posts disappeared as if by magic.
If you are a serviceman and you find yourself under attack by the left wing trendy lawyers I would advise you to get rid of your assets and then at least if you are penniless you can get the same leagal aid that the lawyers will be using to prosecute you.
These posts disappeared as if by magic.
If you are a serviceman and you find yourself under attack by the left wing trendy lawyers I would advise you to get rid of your assets and then at least if you are penniless you can get the same leagal aid that the lawyers will be using to prosecute you.
Sorry if this post doesn't go along with the "outrage bus" everyone seems to be jumping on, or tally with Hangarshuffles comment "...I don't see any number of politicians falling down the aisles to bring in any protective legislation to servicemen - show me where they are, someone? ....". But perhaps people should try reading this:
Defence secretary Michael Fallon: suspend the human rights act to protect our troops - Telegraph
Which was actually reported on 26th Dec, several days before this thread was even started!
Defence secretary Michael Fallon: suspend the human rights act to protect our troops - Telegraph
Which was actually reported on 26th Dec, several days before this thread was even started!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Odiham
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Biggus,
the problem is this was in the Tory manifesto but was dropped at the last Queen's speech as being too problematic. An article in the Torygraph gives no protection but makes good reading.
the problem is this was in the Tory manifesto but was dropped at the last Queen's speech as being too problematic. An article in the Torygraph gives no protection but makes good reading.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Odiham
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This thread/story is a result of reports in the press about the Iraq Historic Allegations Team headed by a former civilian police detective appointed and reporting to the MoD. I would ask why the ministry had to do this? Warfare is horrible and people do things they shouldn't but why this now? During the Falklands there is ample first hand accounts of British soldiers executing Argentine PoWs but nothing was done.
Falklands - a just war popular with the public.
Iraq - .......
Falklands - a just war popular with the public.
Iraq - .......
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Odiham
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And whilst I'm on my high horse a lot of servicemen nowadays only have themselves to blame.
If half the members of Sgt Blackman's troop hadn't had Go Pros that they didn't know how to switch off he would now be a free man whatever the rights and wrongs of his actions and if servicemen in Iraq didn't take pictures of prisoners or dead insurgents then it would be very difficult to substantiate allegations of abuse.
If half the members of Sgt Blackman's troop hadn't had Go Pros that they didn't know how to switch off he would now be a free man whatever the rights and wrongs of his actions and if servicemen in Iraq didn't take pictures of prisoners or dead insurgents then it would be very difficult to substantiate allegations of abuse.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lancashire
Age: 48
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I reckon that the time I served gives me a right to a post on here. The fault doesn't lie with our military, this is a total, political stitch up. Particularly Iraq 2003, where the elephant in the room is the bloke who lied his way in there, and those that supported him (crikey, the current occupant of No10) ! I'm damn sure that British troops did no worse that US troops, but you won't see many Americans investigated like this. It seems that the current government is quite happy to see people who put their necks on the line, as ordered by them, being slaughtered on the altar of political correctness. Whee are the defence chiefs on all this ? Heads down, counting the mounting pension pots I suspect. Military covenant, grossly insulting praise for good men, whilst offering platitudes to those who support the terrorists. As others have already stated, I would think twice about joining if I was "of that age" nowadays.
On a different tack. Happy New year to fellow PPRUNERs. Keep those "Lums" reeking !!!
Smudge
On a different tack. Happy New year to fellow PPRUNERs. Keep those "Lums" reeking !!!
Smudge
Baffles me how Prince Harry spends so much quality time with wounded soldiers that his own Grandma sent to fight an illegal war, pretty messed up when you think about it. No wonder his cheeks are so rosy, I'd be embarrassed too if i were him.
Happy New Year!!!
Jorge Mendonca was surely the exception to the rule? Whilst no one would advocate flagrant abuse of prisoners, why are we so enthusiastic about hounding our servicemen and women who are expected to put their lives on the line. Maybe our ROE need looking at? It seems to me that whilst we robustly observe the ROE, the Americans bend them and the Russians probably don't have them. Maybe it's time for the VSO's to lobby the government and stand up for those who serve this treacherous and ungrateful nation of ours. You gents will know far better than I do, but come on, do the top brass ever go in to bat for those at the sharpend.....I doubt it! Glad my son left the mob......Australia has welcomed him with open arms, and now they're about to claim my daughter too! Still, the PI lawyers will do ok! We'll pay out sh*t loads in compensation and we'll line the pockets of these parasites on the basis of, in some cases, pretty flaky accusations and evidence!
Great Britain.......gimme a break!
Great Britain.......gimme a break!