First eVTOL flight in US
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,470
Received 2,594 Likes
on
1,098 Posts
First eVTOL flight in US
Very clever, but is it any better than a traditional rotor driven by an electric motor and battery? I would have thought that the energy needed to keep the ship airborne would be the same, whether delivered through multiple rotors or just the one?
This flew also:
The key advantage of a multicopter is that the rotor system can use fix pitch propellers. So no need for any articulation. No collective pitch change, let alone cyclic pitch change.
Control about the roll and pitch axes are produced by differential variation of motor speeds across the propeller plane, while yaw control is via appropriate combinations of motor torques.
Presumably also no need to accommodate for lead, lag or dragging or hunting. That makes the whole system much less complex.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,470
Received 2,594 Likes
on
1,098 Posts
I wonder if it does energy recovery in autorotation?
- Battery Energy can be distributed around the airframe and divided between the motors with no need for a main power bus.
- Each motor can have sets of independent stator coils.
- Each set of motor coils can have its own, independent Electronic Speed Controller
- Redundant flight control computers can be provided
- Vehicle can descend safely despite losing one or more motors.
Battery capacity, battery life and certification are problems for multicopters.
Electric passenger aircraft development is where fixed wing was 100 years ago, when all sorts of strange aircraft appeared in the sky with various numbers and configuration of wings and engines.
Similarly, there's no real consensus at the moment of what the final shape of an electric aircraft will turn out to be.
The controllability, stability and performance of the current crop of quadcopter drones, with just four moving parts, hints at what electric aircraft might be able to achieve.
It's interesting times.
Neither appear able to achieve any meaningful forward flight - they're just hovering or pretty much hover taxiing. Then drag of all that framework would cripple the Volocopter's ability to achieve, let alone sustain any significant speed, to say nothing of the form drag of the pod as the pitch angle increased to provide a thrust vector.
Will certification really be posible with no ability to glide (autorotate) in the case of total loss of power? To date I don't belive anything with zero engine-off flying capability is certificated.
Essentially both are simply very large drones from what we've seen here, and thus of very limited use and capability indeed. I can't see any innovative or new capabilities here, just size.
Will certification really be posible with no ability to glide (autorotate) in the case of total loss of power? To date I don't belive anything with zero engine-off flying capability is certificated.
Essentially both are simply very large drones from what we've seen here, and thus of very limited use and capability indeed. I can't see any innovative or new capabilities here, just size.
I think I counted 18 motors/props, some seemed contra rotating so I guess half of them contra rotate. Wonder how it flies if one prop or motor fails? I think some 8 rotor drones can fly with one failure.
Most likely configuration is that the motors spin -L-R-L- as you go round each ring which gives 9 motors in each spin direction and motor pairs on opposing sides of the ring have the same spin, giving an approximately balanced lift to the centre of gravity.
Yaw is achieved by providing more power to the motors spinning in the opposite direction to the desired yaw and reducing the power to the others so that lift is maintained but there is an unbalanced rotational torque.
If a motor fails the simplest algorithm to maintain control would be to spin down the opposite motor to maintain lateral stability and increase the torque on the 7 remaining motors spinning in their direction to maintain lift and yaw stability. A cleverer algorithm would probably be able to generate lift from all 17 remaining motors. You could help by asking any passengers to move the side of the cabin away from the failed motor .
Last edited by netstruggler; 2nd Aug 2021 at 09:18. Reason: Can't subtract 1 from 18 correctly
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,470
Received 2,594 Likes
on
1,098 Posts