Tax liable - all crews flying to the US?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: -
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tax liable - all crews flying to the US?
In Cathay Pacific, all flight crew, cabin crew, ground crew ... have just been advised that they need to file tax, if they fly to or work in the US.
Has anyone else heard of a similar demand? If you fly to the USA - who do you work for, and did your airline tell you that you will now have to file tax in the USA?
This includes crews with no connection to the USA (citizenship, green card etc). It is nearly impossible to avoid flying to the USA if you fly for CX, unless you fly the A330 only.
It is CX that is informing this to the pilots. It's not the US IRS demanding it from CX pilots directly. Chances are that this is (yet another) mistake by CX, like previous on-shoring, closing of bases and other legal mishaps.
More info here:
US Tax question
Has anyone else heard of a similar demand? If you fly to the USA - who do you work for, and did your airline tell you that you will now have to file tax in the USA?
This includes crews with no connection to the USA (citizenship, green card etc). It is nearly impossible to avoid flying to the USA if you fly for CX, unless you fly the A330 only.
It is CX that is informing this to the pilots. It's not the US IRS demanding it from CX pilots directly. Chances are that this is (yet another) mistake by CX, like previous on-shoring, closing of bases and other legal mishaps.
More info here:
US Tax question
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Don't you guys have a union? What is their position on this stuff?
Is Cathay turning this information over to the IRS? Hong Kong doesn't have a tax treaty with the U.S. from what I read online.
The UK, the State of California and various U.S. cities have attempted to tax non-resident crewmembers for time spent in their airspace and on the ground during layovers.
Just ask any pilot if you want tax advice. Some have the courage of their convictions in this area.
The federal prison at Eglin AFB has excellent tennis courts from what a colleague once told me.
Is Cathay turning this information over to the IRS? Hong Kong doesn't have a tax treaty with the U.S. from what I read online.
The UK, the State of California and various U.S. cities have attempted to tax non-resident crewmembers for time spent in their airspace and on the ground during layovers.
Just ask any pilot if you want tax advice. Some have the courage of their convictions in this area.
The federal prison at Eglin AFB has excellent tennis courts from what a colleague once told me.
Unless you're paid in the US, it's hard to see how you could be taxed there. And if you're being taxed in your base jurisdiction (say HKG) you wouldn't be liable to pay tax again on the same earnings in some other jurisdiction.
Unless you're paid in the US, it's hard to see how you could be taxed there. And if you're being taxed in your base jurisdiction (say HKG) you wouldn't be liable to pay tax again on the same earnings in some other jurisdiction.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I'd say from personal experience that both of those assertions are wrong.
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As Airbubba says, these are both incredibly naive assumptions. The first is completely wrong (I was paid for several years in the UK but taxed in HK, for example). And the second assumes a comprehensive avoidance of double taxation agreement between the jurisdictions concerned (which is far from a given), and your citizenship not being one that taxes on that basis rather than on residence.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
California tried to tax me once upon a time. Living in Utah and based in LAX, flying all international. They stood down and went away after telling them they had no jurisdiction over my payroll. Utah was collecting the state tax during this period.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The wheel gets reinvented with U.S. pilots and taxes every few years. Some genius comes up with a scheme to avoid state and/or federal taxes. His buddies get in on the deal and it works great. For a few months.
Then one pilot gets busted, he turns in his (or her) buddies and the feds and the state file felony charges.
An example, some Northwest pilots figured they would claim their home address was a rented mailbox in ANC.
Here's another pilot scheme that's up for renewal, the tax church:
Then one pilot gets busted, he turns in his (or her) buddies and the feds and the state file felony charges.
An example, some Northwest pilots figured they would claim their home address was a rented mailbox in ANC.
Tax probe now includes 42 Northwest Airlines employees
Jan 29, 2003
Associated Press
ST. PAUL -- A tax-cheating probe now includes 42 Northwest Airlines employees, and investigators have said that some pilots may have conspired to avoid paying Minnesota income tax, the St. Paul Pioneer Press reported today.
The paper cited state Revenue Department and Hennepin County officials as saying the probe has been expanded.The case previously involved seven Northwest pilots who were charged with tax evasion. They were accused of collectively owing $321,000 in unfiled taxes since 1996. Two have been convicted.
The 42 people under investigation include the original seven pilots who were charged. It also includes six new criminal probes, and 29 which are being pursued as civil cases.
The criminal cases all involve pilots. Most of the civil cases involve pilots, too, although other Northwest employees are also included, the newspaper reported. Prosecutors face less of a hurdle in bringing the civil cases, since they don't have to prove the "willful intent" necessary to win criminal convictions.
Authorities also have been looking for evidence of a conspiracy among pilots. A search warrant in the case of pilot Randall Enyeart of Excelsior, whose trial begins Monday in Hennepin County District Court, suggests pilots may have worked together.
According to the warrant, Enyeart's now-deceased brother told the state's Criminal Investigation Division that Enyeart was "willfully evading" Minnesota taxes by claiming to be a resident of Alaska, which has is no state income tax.
"He (Enyeart's brother) stated that several NWA pilots were sharing an address in Anchorage, Alaska, as their residence while retaining permanent residences in other locations," the warrant says.
Enyeart's attorney, Bob Sicoli of Minneapolis, said it's wrong to assume the warrant suggests that pilots cooperated with each other to evade taxes. He noted the warrant cannot be used as evidence, and said Enyeart is innocent.
Hennepin County prosecutors are handling the criminal cases for the state. In addition to the first two pilots who were convicted, and Enyeart, four others face trial dates over the next three months. Six others are under investigation, and may soon face criminal charges, said Hennepin County Attorney [now U.S. Senator D-Minn. and 2020 Presidential Candidate] Amy Klobuchar.
Last October, in the first pilot case, Dakota County Judge Karen Asphaug found Geoffrey Hickman of Mendota Heights guilty on five counts of tax evasion. The judge reduced the charges to a misdemeanor and sentenced Hickman to 150 days in jail. That ruling is under appeal.
A Northwest spokesman declined comment on the cases and ongoing investigations.
ST. PAUL -- A tax-cheating probe now includes 42 Northwest Airlines employees, and investigators have said that some pilots may have conspired to avoid paying Minnesota income tax, the St. Paul Pioneer Press reported today.
The paper cited state Revenue Department and Hennepin County officials as saying the probe has been expanded.The case previously involved seven Northwest pilots who were charged with tax evasion. They were accused of collectively owing $321,000 in unfiled taxes since 1996. Two have been convicted.
The 42 people under investigation include the original seven pilots who were charged. It also includes six new criminal probes, and 29 which are being pursued as civil cases.
The criminal cases all involve pilots. Most of the civil cases involve pilots, too, although other Northwest employees are also included, the newspaper reported. Prosecutors face less of a hurdle in bringing the civil cases, since they don't have to prove the "willful intent" necessary to win criminal convictions.
Authorities also have been looking for evidence of a conspiracy among pilots. A search warrant in the case of pilot Randall Enyeart of Excelsior, whose trial begins Monday in Hennepin County District Court, suggests pilots may have worked together.
According to the warrant, Enyeart's now-deceased brother told the state's Criminal Investigation Division that Enyeart was "willfully evading" Minnesota taxes by claiming to be a resident of Alaska, which has is no state income tax.
"He (Enyeart's brother) stated that several NWA pilots were sharing an address in Anchorage, Alaska, as their residence while retaining permanent residences in other locations," the warrant says.
Enyeart's attorney, Bob Sicoli of Minneapolis, said it's wrong to assume the warrant suggests that pilots cooperated with each other to evade taxes. He noted the warrant cannot be used as evidence, and said Enyeart is innocent.
Hennepin County prosecutors are handling the criminal cases for the state. In addition to the first two pilots who were convicted, and Enyeart, four others face trial dates over the next three months. Six others are under investigation, and may soon face criminal charges, said Hennepin County Attorney [now U.S. Senator D-Minn. and 2020 Presidential Candidate] Amy Klobuchar.
Last October, in the first pilot case, Dakota County Judge Karen Asphaug found Geoffrey Hickman of Mendota Heights guilty on five counts of tax evasion. The judge reduced the charges to a misdemeanor and sentenced Hickman to 150 days in jail. That ruling is under appeal.
A Northwest spokesman declined comment on the cases and ongoing investigations.
Here's another pilot scheme that's up for renewal, the tax church:
January 6, 1981 (UPI) HOUSTON -- An attorney for 10 Braniff Airways pilots who declared themselves ministers of the Basic Bible Church of America, obtained a church building, then stopped paying income taxes, said Monday he expects his clients to be indicted for tax fraud.
Lawyer Jerry Birnberg made the statement as another client, former Texas International Airlines pilot Charles L. Kageler, was sentenced to four years in prison and fined $5,000 for claiming tax-exempt status on his mail-order ministry in a Minnesota church.
Kageler, 47, of Meridian, Texas, also must serve five years probation after release from prison.
According to evidence presented during his trial, Kageler in 1977 paid $750 to a Minnesota man who issued a charter for the 'Basic Bible Church of America, Order of Almighty God, Chapter 7903.'
Testimony showed Kageler then took a vow of poverty, deeded to the church all his assets and future income, and refused to pay income taxes. Defense attorney Jerry Patchen said Kageler was not motivated by greed, and thought he was taking advantage of a legitimate tax loophole.
Although Kageler insisted he was a genuine minister who performed marriages and held religious services, government prosecutors successfully argued the church and the vow were a sham designed to avoid paying federal income taxes. Kageler was convicted in November of illegally withholding $40,000 in taxes from the Internal Revenue Service from 1977 through 1979.
As a TIA pilot of 20 years, Kageler was earning about $60,000 annually, prosecutors said.
Following Kageler's sentencing, his defense lawyer said the U.S. attorney's office in Fort Worth had been investigating the 10 Braniff pilots for the last year.
Birnberg said the cases had no direct link other than that both Kageler and the Braniff pilots all joined the same church.
Kageler has been on leave without pay from TIA. Braniff spokesman Jere Cox said Braniff had taken no action against any of its pilots being investigated.
Lawyer Jerry Birnberg made the statement as another client, former Texas International Airlines pilot Charles L. Kageler, was sentenced to four years in prison and fined $5,000 for claiming tax-exempt status on his mail-order ministry in a Minnesota church.
Kageler, 47, of Meridian, Texas, also must serve five years probation after release from prison.
According to evidence presented during his trial, Kageler in 1977 paid $750 to a Minnesota man who issued a charter for the 'Basic Bible Church of America, Order of Almighty God, Chapter 7903.'
Testimony showed Kageler then took a vow of poverty, deeded to the church all his assets and future income, and refused to pay income taxes. Defense attorney Jerry Patchen said Kageler was not motivated by greed, and thought he was taking advantage of a legitimate tax loophole.
Although Kageler insisted he was a genuine minister who performed marriages and held religious services, government prosecutors successfully argued the church and the vow were a sham designed to avoid paying federal income taxes. Kageler was convicted in November of illegally withholding $40,000 in taxes from the Internal Revenue Service from 1977 through 1979.
As a TIA pilot of 20 years, Kageler was earning about $60,000 annually, prosecutors said.
Following Kageler's sentencing, his defense lawyer said the U.S. attorney's office in Fort Worth had been investigating the 10 Braniff pilots for the last year.
Birnberg said the cases had no direct link other than that both Kageler and the Braniff pilots all joined the same church.
Kageler has been on leave without pay from TIA. Braniff spokesman Jere Cox said Braniff had taken no action against any of its pilots being investigated.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Asia
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It’s pretty simple, crew who hold greencards have been lying about it to the company and the IRS. They avoid paying US tax but the company gets fined big time when the IRS finally connects the dots............as the IRS usually does.
They then get in strife with the company, who isn’t happy about paying the IRS big fines. The AOA gets involved, “they only lied, you only got fined, no harm done” etc.
Pilots and tax, this sh*t never gets old......
They then get in strife with the company, who isn’t happy about paying the IRS big fines. The AOA gets involved, “they only lied, you only got fined, no harm done” etc.
Pilots and tax, this sh*t never gets old......
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: -
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It’s pretty simple, crew who hold greencards have been lying about it to the company and the IRS. They avoid paying US tax but the company gets fined big time when the IRS finally connects the dots............as the IRS usually does.
They then get in strife with the company, who isn’t happy about paying the IRS big fines. The AOA gets involved, “they only lied, you only got fined, no harm done” etc.
Pilots and tax, this sh*t never gets old......
They then get in strife with the company, who isn’t happy about paying the IRS big fines. The AOA gets involved, “they only lied, you only got fined, no harm done” etc.
Pilots and tax, this sh*t never gets old......
If all states did this, then pilots in international operations would typically have to file taxes for dozens of different tax jurisdictions.
Clearly, that is not possible.
Apart from the paid taxes, imagine the combined fees for tax advisors. There is only 100% of your salary available, and ideally, some of that salary goes to the flight crew in question, to pay their bills and maybe even ... have some fun with their earnings.
This is not about having fake addresses in mail boxes, avoiding tax by being off shore. Living and working in Hong Kong, paid in Hong Kong, paying tax in Hong Kong. Should US long haul pilots start paying tax in Hong Kong, China, Australia, UK, Germany, Holland or wherever they happen to be sent to by their employer?
I am just curious to know - has any other long haul pilot, working for a non-US carrier, being non-US-resident/green card/passport holder, been met with similar demands?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: -
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Crew members. Compensation for services performed by a nonresident alien in connection with the individual's temporary presence in the United States as a regular crew member of a foreign vessel (for example, a boat or ship) engaged in transportation between the United States and a foreign country or U.S. possession is not U.S. source income and is exempt from U.S. tax. This exemption does not apply to compensation for services performed on foreign aircraft.
Does any other non-US airline impose the same requirement, for their crews to file US taxes?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: -
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's not about "think", unfortunately. Agree, it doesn't make sense, for should ever state do this, then long haul pilots would be declaring taxes in dozens of states.
If they try to pull this one off, then I hope that every nation affected will retaliate ASAP.
If they try to pull this one off, then I hope that every nation affected will retaliate ASAP.
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Warwick
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Although the U.K. does not have different state taxes where your main home decides where you pay taxes. The term “Domiciled” is used so if you are an Expat and live in Spain you pay Spanish taxes, as part of that is you cannot live in the UK for more than half the year. There are very complex and strict rules and the revenue are very tenacious overseeing expat tax accounts.
An airline pilot UK citizen could “domicile” himself in HK pay tax there but could not visit U.K. for more than 183 days a year, but if he had a wife and kids in the UK there would be problems.
An airline pilot UK citizen could “domicile” himself in HK pay tax there but could not visit U.K. for more than 183 days a year, but if he had a wife and kids in the UK there would be problems.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Although the U.K. does not have different state taxes where your main home decides where you pay taxes. The term “Domiciled” is used so if you are an Expat and live in Spain you pay Spanish taxes, as part of that is you cannot live in the UK for more than half the year. There are very complex and strict rules and the revenue are very tenacious overseeing expat tax accounts.
An airline pilot UK citizen could “domicile” himself in HK pay tax there but could not visit U.K. for more than 183 days a year, but if he had a wife and kids in the UK there would be problems.
An airline pilot UK citizen could “domicile” himself in HK pay tax there but could not visit U.K. for more than 183 days a year, but if he had a wife and kids in the UK there would be problems.
Foreign Earned Income Exclusion - Physical Presence Test
You meet the physical presence test if you are physically present in a foreign country or countries 330 full days during a period of 12 consecutive months. The 330 qualifying days do not have to be consecutive. The physical presence test applies to both U.S. citizens and U.S. resident aliens.
The physical presence test is based only on how long you stay in a foreign country or countries. This test does not depend on the kind of residence you establish, your intentions about returning to the United States, or the nature and purpose of your stay abroad. However, your intentions with regard to the nature and purpose of your stay abroad are relevant in determining whether you meet the tax home test, as explained under Chapter 4 of Publication 54, Tax Guide for U.S. Citizens and Resident Aliens Abroad.
The physical presence test is based only on how long you stay in a foreign country or countries. This test does not depend on the kind of residence you establish, your intentions about returning to the United States, or the nature and purpose of your stay abroad. However, your intentions with regard to the nature and purpose of your stay abroad are relevant in determining whether you meet the tax home test, as explained under Chapter 4 of Publication 54, Tax Guide for U.S. Citizens and Resident Aliens Abroad.
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yup, as a British National resident off shore for >15 years, still paying U.K. NI and income tax on U.K. income tax but disenfranchised I agree..
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Tana
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally, I think it's a bunch of crap.