MeLuvUlongtime

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...w/76172607.cms

Lonewolf_50

From the OP Link:
FEDEX MD-11.
Cyclone Nisarga mentioned as increasing crosswinds.
Landed RWY 14 Would be interested to see the METAR on this one.

ManaAdaSystem

Ahh, runway 14! Fond memories of landing on that runway. Not grooved, very uneven and very slippery when wet. Autobrakes max and max reverse recommended.
This FedEx is not the first one go go off that runway, and will not be the last. I seem to recall an Air India 747 with the nose over the end of that runway.
Had to use it when somebody stole the localizer antenna for runway 27. That runway is also a trap. Looks like a long nice runway until you find out not so much runway is left when you subtract the underrun.

KingAir1978

vabb 031700z 28010g20kt 3000 hz few012 sct018 few025tcu bkn080 28/25 q1002 tempo 1500 shra
vabb 031630z 28009g19kt 3000 -dz few012 sct018 few030cb bkn080 28/25 q1001 tempo 1500 shra
vabb 031600z 29008kt 3000 -dz few012 sct018 few030cb ovc080 28/25 q1001 tempo 1500 shra
vabb 031530z 28010g20kt 3000 -dz few012 sct018 few030cb ovc080 28/25 q1000 tempo 1500 shra

vabb 031500z 29006kt 4000 -dz few012 sct018 few030cb ovc080 28/25 q0999 becmg 3000 -ra
vabb 031430z 30005kt 5000 -dz few008 bkn015 few030cb ovc080 27/24 q0999 tempo 2000 shra
vabb 031400z 32009kt 4000 -dz few008 bkn015 few030cb ovc080 28/24 q0998 tempo 1500 shra
vabb 031330z 33011kt 4000 -dz few008 bkn015 few030cb ovc080 28/25 q0998 tempo 1500 shra

vabb 031300z 30009kt 4000 -dz few008 bkn015 few030cb ovc080 27/25 q0996 tempo 1500 shra
vabb 031230z 32013kt 4000 -dz few008 bkn015 few030cb ovc080 28/25 q0995 tempo 1500 shra
vabb 031200z 30012kt 3500 -dz few008 bkn015 few030cb ovc080 28/25 q0994 becmg 4000 -dz
vabb 031130z 31015kt 3500 -dz few008 bkn015 few030cb ovc080 27/25 q0994 tempo 1500 ra

vabb 031100z 32014kt 3000 dz few008 bkn015 few030cb ovc080 27/25 q0993 tempo 1500 ra
vabb 031030z 33016kt 3000 -ra few008 bkn018 few030cb ovc080 27/25 q0992 tempo 1500 ra
vabb 031000z 33021kt 3000 ra few010 bkn018 few030cb ovc080 27/25 q0992 tempo 1500 ra
vabb 030930z 34019kt 3000 ra few010 bkn018 few030cb ovc080 27/24 q0992 tempo 1500 ra

vabb 030900z 35021kt 2400 -ra few010 bkn018 few030cb ovc080 27/24 q0992 becmg 3000 -ra
vabb 030830z 03021g31kt 2200 dz few012 sct018 few030cb ovc080 28/24 q0993 tempo 1500 shra
vabb 030800z 02021g31kt 2200 dz few012 sct018 few030cb ovc080 28/24 q0994 tempo 1500 shra
vabb 030730z 02020g30kt 2200 -ra few012 sct018 few030cb ovc080 27/24 q0996 tempo 1500 shra

vabb 030700z 02013g23kt 2200 -ra few012 sct018 few030cb ovc080 27/25 q0996 tempo 1500 shra
vabb 030630z 03011g21kt 2200 -ra few012 sct018 few030cb ovc080 27/25 q0997 tempo 1500 shra
vabb 030600z 03010g20kt 2200 -ra few012 sct018 few030cb ovc080 27/25 q0998 tempo 1500 shra
vabb 030530z 03013g23kt 2200 -ra few012 sct018 few030cb ovc080 27/25 q0999 tempo 1500 shra

Airbubba

Amen, been there, done that as well.

I remember that one. They stole the antenna so they could sell the metal for scrap.

And, doing the VOR to 32, you could see folks on the veranda sipping a Kingfisher as you whizzed past Trombay Hill.

ManaAdaSystem

Ay! Report Trombay hill in sight! Had 1 hour of extra fuel. It was enough. Just.

Airbubba

The runway excursion occurred at about 0645Z.

vilas

It's long time ago but I remember RW14 has a dip somewhere around maybe1000ft from the threshold if you float past that it gives a feeling of ballooning. Need to put the aircraft down. Two Air India aircraft have gone off the other end. The first one was B747-300 which was poor piloting landing in rain with no Auto brake, idle reverse and late insufficient manual braking led to that. The second one was B747-400 landing in the infamous deluge of 2005 that had breached the boundary wall and unnoticed some oil had floated in smearing the runway and making it slippery.

Dan Winterland

I saw a video of the overrun. It looked very wet judging by the spray being thrown up by the reversers.

treadigraph

dixi188

Why can't the media use the correct aviation terms, a few moments to check the web.
"Overshoot" is what a "Go Around" used to be called.
Running out of runway is "Overrun".

( Becoming a grumpy old man).

Less Hair

Might be depending on the country you are in and if civil or military? How about overshoot of localizer and centerline?

FBW390

dixi 188 is right: this is clearly an overrun.
Let's notice that this landing, with a wind from 030°, was with some tailwind, and on the shortest runway! LDA 14 = 2526 m! Instead of rwy 09 with LDA = 3045 m...And the MD-11 is notorious for having very high approach speed, due to its wing similar to the DC'10's, with a much heavier weight! So: tailwind, short runway, high approach speed, very wet runway: the recipe for disaster! Nearly avoided!
Why couldn't they ask to land with the ILS 09? Or request it? Anybody know if they did? I know for instance, the regular LH MD-11 bound for IST old Ataturk airport, used to ask and obtain 35 L or R for landing instead of the shorter 05 used by every other aircraft...
Remark: landing 32 in BOM, headwind, was not an option, due to VIS 2200 meters, and minima 2500m, as a VOR approach, no ILS...
Let's be positive: what can we learn? With a widebody aircraft, in this heavy rain situation, either hold for weather to improve, an/or request the longest runway into the wind! Not tailwind!!!

FBW 390

Less Hair

I'd call this an overrun too. But not some go around an overshoot.

FullWings

Interesting that on the video it sounds like more reverse thrust was being applied as the aircraft comes into frame, which implies it wasn’t being fully utilised at that point on what appears to be a pretty low-friction surface near the end of the runway...

Pistonprop

Not easy to tell, but from what I can see, it doesn't appear to have left the tarmac.

ManaAdaSystem

Did he have a compressor stall on the left engine before he turned left?

Locked door

Two sets of compressor stalls visible on the left engine. One set as he emerges from behind the pillar and one set just before the left turn. The right engine may well be doing the same thing but we can’t see it. Probably a result of max reverse at low speed.

It sounds like max reverse was applied when the crew realised the remaining pavement was insufficient, all that water on TDZ rubber deposits doesn’t help.

KingAir1978

I'm not sure from how far the video was shot. It would take the noise several seconds to reach the camera man. Landing on RWY 09 would seem more sensible, but knowing Indian ATC, it would be a pain in the neck to get your request granted.

Airbubba

ILS to runway 09 was out of service which may have been a player. Maybe the thieves stole the antennas again to sell for scrap metal.

They may have just put the nosewheel in the mud. I had a colleague land somewhere else and find out that a runway exit he planned to use was Notamed closed on page 17 of the paperwork. He dragged a bogie through the grass trying to turn around on the runway. No damage but since it occurred before he exited the runway after landing it was declared a runway excursion and a major investigation complete with hearings and transcribed testimony was held.