Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

Glider crash, two killed, Mt beauty

Wikiposts
Search
Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Glider crash, two killed, Mt beauty

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Apr 2024, 09:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ex Horn Island
Posts: 106
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Glider crash, two killed, Mt Beauty, Victoria, Australia

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-...ance/103776166

Last edited by I spy; 1st May 2024 at 16:25.
I spy is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2024, 16:21
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Up yer nose, again.
Age: 67
Posts: 1,233
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
How many accidents have happened over the years where the purpose of the flight was to scatter someone's ashes?
Peter Fanelli is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2024, 19:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 337
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Peter Fanelli
How many accidents have happened over the years where the purpose of the flight was to scatter someone's ashes?
Very few that I have heard of, though I know of several caes where 'loose' ashes have caused distraction and some confusion. It does need careful planning. The fact the accident happened close to the airfield suggests it may not be ash drop related. The machine looks rather like a Grob 109.
Very sad
biscuit74 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2024, 20:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,232
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Peter Fanelli
How many accidents have happened over the years where the purpose of the flight was to scatter someone's ashes?
Well since you brought it up, how many?
B2N2 is online now  
Old 27th Apr 2024, 20:34
  #5 (permalink)  
UV
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Essex
Posts: 653
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Confirmed Grob 109B

https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/386969
UV is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2024, 22:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Gliding Australia (ASAO) is supporting Victorian Police and Coroner in gathering evidence, inspecting, investigating and analysing. The Grob G109B was VH registered, privately operated, visiting Mount Beauty. Many lines of investigation to be pursued; it is too early to speculate on causal issues. Our focus is also on wellbeing of family, friends, aviation colleagues affected by this crash.
Bunyan Wingnut is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2024, 23:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 40
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
This one hits hard. Was watching the aircraft last weekend flown by other members of the syndicate at its home airfield.

Last edited by cirrus32; 28th Apr 2024 at 10:21.
cirrus32 is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2024, 05:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Denmark
Age: 68
Posts: 405
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Peter Fanelli
How many accidents have happened over the years where the purpose of the flight was to scatter someone's ashes?
We aren't counting Trevor you know who here, are we?
sablatnic is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2024, 08:52
  #9 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,696
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
A G109 is not a glider ( re title) and not so simple to fly , we had one in our club, many incidents / accidents ( minor) with it.
I wonder if the experienced pilot was having it on this type .
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2024, 09:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Forgive me for raising the point, but I do feel it needs raising. The title of this thread, "Glider crash, two killed, Mt beauty", isn't helpful to many (most?) readers, because it refers to a location they won't ever have heard of. The thread is also in a section of PPRuNe that is not geographically specific, so there are no first-glance clues as to where this accident occurred. Surely it would be helpful to others if the author added a country, and perhaps a state in the thread title?

Seeing the country included in a thread title, of this nature, would certainly help readers direct their attention to threads of particular interest. If there isn't enough room to include state and country in a title, perhaps confine the specific "Mt beauty" location to the opening line of a post. For example, a title of 'Glider accident Victoria, Australia; 2 fatalities' quickly guides those who wish to read further, with the precise location better kept for the the opening post itself?

Whilst not applicable to this thread, it is similar to threads that announce themselves as, for example, 'Aircraft Accident today at Big Airport'. The use of the word 'today' is meaningless, once the calendar moves on. Better to use the specific date, so that if the thread is still active, even months or years later, readers can quickly and easily see, from the thread title, whether it is today, recent, or quite some time ago. I will add that, due to the way North America tends to format dates, it is far less confusing if writers use the name of the month, rather than the number of the month e.g. '10th May 1979' or 'May 10th 1979' are far quicker to mentally process. However, written as '10/05/1979' or '05/10/1979', things just get confusing.

Just to be clear, I mean no disrespect to the people closely involved in the tragic event highlighted by this thread, but contributors shouldn't forget that it is a world-wide forum, and how they write can be just as important as the subject they write about.


EDIT: As it turns out, there is a duplicate thread in The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions section.

Last edited by deeceethree; 28th Apr 2024 at 09:33.
deeceethree is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2024, 12:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 313
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
A G109 is not a glider ( re title) and not so simple to fly , we had one in our club, many incidents / accidents ( minor) with it.
I wonder if the experienced pilot was having it on this type .
They seem to have a few fatalities. https://aviation-safety.net/asndb/type/G109
RickNRoll is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2024, 13:08
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Denmark
Age: 68
Posts: 405
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RickNRoll
They seem to have a few fatalities. https://aviation-safety.net/asndb/type/G109
Yes, and people are still killed in mid airs, by colliding with trees or by stalling when showing off. Take a look at the reports.
sablatnic is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2024, 13:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 651
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
A G109 is not a glider ( re title)
The Grob 109 is a two seat self launching motor glider.
EXDAC is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2024, 15:56
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 337
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
A G109 is not a glider ( re title) and not so simple to fly , we had one in our club, many incidents / accidents ( minor) with it.
I wonder if the experienced pilot was having it on this type .
Interesting. I have had a share in a Grob 109B motor glider for years. I like it a lot and find it easier and more capable than several other motor gliders I've used and owned. It does need thoughtful operation, of course.

Apart from normal maintenance issues like brake fade and brake leaks from one side in particular, we have had few 'incidents' and so far (touch wood) no accidents. We are all current glider pilots as well as power pilots, which helps, and are well aware of the challenges which go with motor glider ops - low climb rates etc. Admittedly this is syndicate use, not club. There are simpler, perhaps more robust, lower performance motor gliders arguably more suitable for club use.

What problems have your club had? Always useful to find out from others rather than make all the errors ourselvses !
biscuit74 is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2024, 16:39
  #15 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,696
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by EXDAC
The Grob 109 is a two seat self launching motor glider.
no , the G109 is a motor glider , or TMG in EASA speak ,which needs a special TMG licence , more like a PPL , it is not a self launching glider which you fly with a glider licence ( SPL) and a self launch endorsement .

@ biscuit74 : The main issue with it in our club use was the variable pitch prop combined with an underpowered heavy aircraft and some people only flying it a couple of hours a year. Most hiccups were on go around or even attempting taking off on wrong prop settings.also the small wheel base added up . Not really a club aircraft . We sold it to the UK which seems to like them 😏

.
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2024, 21:48
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 651
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
no , the G109 is a motor glider , or TMG in EASA speak ,which needs a special TMG licence , more like a PPL , it is not a self launching glider which you fly with a glider licence ( SPL) and a self launch endorsement ..
That may be true in UK, or under EASA rules, but it is not true in USA. I do not know the rules in Australia which is where the accident you are commenting on happened. I have flown several self launching motor gliders on my FAA glider rating with no endorsement required since I am grandfathered, just as I need no tailwheel endorsement to fly my tailwheel aircraft. TMG means nothing in USA. Does it in Australia?

If you want to dig a bit deeper into FAA rules, one self launching motor glider I flew needed a type rating! It was turbo jet powered.



Last edited by EXDAC; 28th Apr 2024 at 22:41. Reason: add FAA registry extract showing aircraft type a "glider".
EXDAC is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2024, 01:22
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
"Two-Seater Motor Glider Accident, Mount Beauty, Victoria, Australia, Sat 27 April 2024" would have been a better heading.
Grob G109B motor glider accident. Very experienced pilot, extensive gliding and touring motor glider background. Qualified instructor. In Australia, gliders and motor gliders are on CASA National Aircraft Register, and operated and maintained to approved standards. Gliding Australia is Part 149 Approved Self-Administering Aviation Organisation. Glider pilot training is provided against approved syllabi by Gliding Australia instructors. Flying a TMG requires specific training syllabus and qualifications endorsed.
Investigation is continuing, Gliding Australia supporting police and coroner.
Male pilot and female passenger killed. Flight was to scatter ashes of passenger's father, pilot's close friend, over Mount Beauty airport in Victorian high country.
Accidents like this hit the gliding and regional aviation community hard. Our first thoughts are with the family, friends, gliding club members and aviation colleagues, affected communities. Most tragic circumstances, so be considerate of the wellbeing of people who might read this stuff.
Yes, we want to better understand causes and risk factors. Keep an eye on the Gliding Australia FB page and website.
Bunyan Wingnut is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2024, 09:27
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lander, WY, USA
Posts: 289
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wondering how ashes would be released, the 109B has gull wing doors, can't imagine they're approved for opening during flight.
Sad story, RIP.
340drvr is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2024, 09:34
  #19 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,696
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
@EXDAC : thanks for your explanations on FAA licensing , fits your country motto “ land of the free and home of the brave “ I only wish EASA would ease up their licences endorsements !
for me it is your definition of s “self launching motor glider “ is what puzzled me , it is an anachronism : a motorglider would automatically self launch , a glider not necessarily hence the difference . Also very different in handling both
expecting a pure glider pilot to handle a heavy and underpowered ( almost all are ) motorglider with a viable pitch prop is not really advisable hence 2 different training syllabus and licence in Europe .
i have no idea how it is spit in Australia either .

@Bunyan Wingnut: sorry for your loss .indeed let’s wait to hear the reasons . No trying in any way to try to apportion blame on the pilot . **** happens sometimes, we all know that ,
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2024, 09:59
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Finland
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T-O from rwy 14 looks quite interesting for Grob 109 and not so good climb performance. Was the accident on T-O or approach of level flight?
-M-
mjh FE is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.