Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Chinese CVA by 2010

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Chinese CVA by 2010

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Feb 2024, 13:56
  #121 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,542
Received 1,674 Likes on 770 Posts
Of note, the QLZ and POW don’t have fan tails or an engine test area either, but are still considered long-range blue water carriers….

https://qr.ae/psRYtV

As it seems, this is one of the clearest recent images of the PLANS-18 „Fujian“ after being in the water again since 14th February.



The most obvious question for this angle is yet again what sort of facilities, if any Fujian has to test aircraft engines onboard. There may not be any, pointing to the possibility that the carrier is primarily intended for operations not too far abroad. Pure guessing of course.

To illustrate what I am referring to, here you see the related fitting (door and sponson) on Nimitz CVN. The area in question is the sponson carrying the writing "Harry S Truman" and the opening above it on the first image.





​​​​​​​
ORAC is online now  
Old 19th Feb 2024, 14:31
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 532
Received 178 Likes on 94 Posts
Unhappy

Originally Posted by ORAC
Of note, the QLZ and POW don’t have fan tails or an engine test area either, but are still considered long-range blue water carriers….

https://qr.ae/psRYtV

As it seems, this is one of the clearest recent images of the PLANS-18 „Fujian“ after being in the water again since 14th February.

The most obvious question for this angle is yet again what sort of facilities, if any Fujian has to test aircraft engines onboard. There may not be any, pointing to the possibility that the carrier is primarily intended for operations not too far abroad. Pure guessing of course.

To illustrate what I am referring to, here you see the related fitting (door and sponson) on Nimitz CVN. The area in question is the sponson carrying the writing "Harry S Truman" and the opening above it on the first image.
I wouldn't get too worried about that. It's entirely possible they've got such a facility - all you need is a seating / test bed with fuel and control system and a duct to ensure you get clean non-fodded air.

Its also possible that they're assuming their engines will be so reliable they'll get minimal use out of such a facility...(ho ho ho) or that they'll be delivered by the engine OEM via magical COD (ho ho ho again).

To be fair, it may be that the engine test facility is a legacy holdover from previous engines - I'd suspect frequency of use depends on frequency of engine change and whether you need to do a bench test prior to strapping it into the cab and testing that, noting that full-power runs might be challenging in tie down terms!
Not_a_boffin is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 20th Feb 2024, 12:13
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,711
Received 40 Likes on 24 Posts
He does make the assumbition that the area on the stern immediately below the flight deck isn't just shielding to hide that area whilst in the dockyard

e.g. CdeG in dock



CdeG at Sea
Davef68 is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Davef68:
Old 19th Apr 2024, 12:01
  #124 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,542
Received 1,674 Likes on 770 Posts
https://www.twz.com/sea/deck-of-chin...rcraft-mockups

Deck Of China’s Nearly Complete Carrier Now Hosting Multiple Aircraft Mockups

The sight of mock fighters, a trainer, and an early warning and control aircraft on the Fujian gives a glimpse of its future air wing.
ORAC is online now  
Old 1st May 2024, 21:58
  #125 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,542
Received 1,674 Likes on 770 Posts
Video report. China's New Carrier Starts Sea Trials

China's third and most advanced aircraft carrier, named Fujian, has begun sea trials.

​​​​​​​Via TaiwanPlus News.
ORAC is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 2nd May 2024, 01:38
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,588
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 46 Posts
FUJIAN begins sea trials 01 May 2024


JPG: https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/...d/AA1nZleJ.img

SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 4th May 2024, 20:23
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,588
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 46 Posts
Chinese Aircraft Carrier Fujian Leaves for First Set of Sea Trials - USNI News 01 May 2024 Dzirhan Mahadzir
https://news.usni.org/2024/05/01/chi...-of-sea-trials
“...In March, Yuan Huazhi, political commissar of the PLAN, told Chinese media that China would announce a fourth carrier soon and would also reveal if it would be a nuclear powered or a conventionally powered like its existing three carriers. So far no official announcement has been made....

...PLA Daily also reported that in the summer, the female trainee pilots will carry out advanced flight training which will include instrument flying, navigation, formation flying and night flying. In its 2023 recruitment announcement, PLAN stated that after two months of basic training, cadet pilots would undergo 3-4 years of flight training at the PLA Naval Aviation University before graduating for assignment, thus, at the earliest, China will have its first batch of female naval aviators in late 2026.”
SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 11th May 2024, 16:23
  #128 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,542
Received 1,674 Likes on 770 Posts
I thought this was an interesting question, so I compared the islands and starboard sides of the Shandong and Fujian more closely, and realized that this was indeed a interesting design of the Fujian. 1/11

Is there a reason why the island is slightly inboard from the right side of the ship on Fijian?

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...166177678.html
ORAC is online now  
Old 12th May 2024, 21:39
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somerset
Posts: 194
Received 43 Likes on 16 Posts
An "Alaskan Highway" gives a route from the island to the aircraft park at the bow, without coming near the recovery runway or aircraft. Since the bow park Stbd is where the recovery cycle aircraft are usually heading there are pilots to get inboard and debrief and maintainers to get to the aircraft and safe/ turn/service them, at the same time the runway is in use. It makes the deck ballet choreography easier.

I believe the RN once tried an Alaskan Highway big enough for aircraft. That had theoretical benefit to the process of getting the (serviceable) aircraft back to tye aft parks readh for thr next launch cycle. It didn't work out, I think.

At 0200, with the ship darkened, the Alaskan Highway was a cold and lonely place to be whilst waiting for your pinger turnround, audible in the stbd wait for at least half an hour while Wings buggered about with another Stovie launch.

N
Bengo is offline  
Old 12th May 2024, 23:26
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,304
Received 137 Likes on 89 Posts
My understanding is the Alaskan Highway was only ever part of the CVA-01 design development and would likely have been abandoned if she had been built, which was sensibly not revisited for the QEs. The deck area outboard from Fujian's island is too narrow for aircraft and I suspect exists as the island is positioned directly above the machinery space whereas the deck including two lifts projects out from above the waterline.
SLXOwft is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.